Rachel Corrie: An American Hero and a True Beauty: RIP

Rachel Corrie, a brave beatiful young American woman. So different from the materialistic, petty, money obsessed people who make up our society. She was an anachronism, and a breath of fresh air. She was taken from this world way too soon. May God bless her and keep her. We must remember her, and remember those who murdered her. The Jew controlled Western media ignored her death, as they ignored her pleas for peace in life. But the powers that be took note of her, you can be sure of that. Those like Rachel, of whom there are too few, are a direct threat to their perpetual war machine.

Rachel Corrie: God bless you and keep you. Rest in Peace.

Rachel as a child:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK8Z3i3aTq4


Rachel speaks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3JI-axaRF4

　
Rachel Corrie, American hero!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUoZGnvZwNY

　
The killing of Rachel Corrie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10DB6xulhhU

　
In the loving memory of a truly brave American Hero Rachel Corrie (RIP):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYWifWNKTcU

Israeli Assassinations and US Presidents

Very interesting article from InformationClearninghouse.info, a great sit for news that you won't get from the controllled media. Examine the information provided, and make up your own mind about it.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30362.htm

Bush & Obama? Israeli Assassinations and US Presidents

By Alison Weir

January 26, 2012 --  On January 13th the Atlanta Jewish Times featured a column by its owner-publisher suggesting that Israel might someday need to “order a hit” on the president of the United States. In the column, publisher Andrew Adler describes a scenario in which Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu would need to “give the go-ahead for U.S. based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel.”

The purpose? So that the vice president could then take office and dictate U.S. policies that would help the Jewish state “obliterate its enemies.” Adler writes that it is highly likely that the idea “has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles.”


Numerous Jewish leaders quickly condemned Adler, who has now apologized for the column, resigned, and there are some reports that he plans to put the newspaper up for sale. An Israeli columnist noted that the hatred being stirred up against Obama is similar to conditions in Israel that led to the murder of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin by a Jewish extremist.


Many of those criticizing Adler claim that he had defamed Israel by suggesting that it would ever do such a thing. Abe Foxman, head of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) proclaimed: “There is absolutely no excuse, no justification, no rationalization for this kind of rhetoric. It doesn’t even belong in fiction.”


In reality, however, Adler’s expectation that Israel’s inner circles have explored such a course of action, and would be willing to undertake it, may be entirely accurate. The fact is that Israel has killed and plotted to assassinate people throughout the world; a number have been Americans. One alleged plot was chillingly similar to Adler’s suggestion.


Secret Service warned of Israeli assassination plans


There is evidence that in 1991 an Israeli undercover team planned to assassinate a U.S. President. The intended victim was George Herbert Walker Bush.


The first person to write of the plot was a former 11-term Republican Congressman from Illinois, Paul Findley. In a 1992 article in the Washington Report for Middle East Affairs, Findley described the alleged scheme and how it was revealed.


Findley writes that the U.S. Secret Service had received a warning that elements of Israel’s spy agency might target Bush when he went to Madrid for the opening day of the peace conference to be held that year.


According to Findley, a former Mossad agent named Victor Ostrovsky who had written a book exposing Israel’s spy agency told a group of Canadian parliamentarians that he had received secret intelligence suggesting that the “the Mossad's hatred of Bush – and support for Vice President Dan Quayle – might lead to an attempt on the president's life.”


Israel considered Quayle much closer to Israel than Bush. Bush had particularly angered Israel by attempting to pressure Israel into ending its illegal settlement expansion on confiscated Palestinian land by withholding loan guarantees until Israel ended this practice.


Findley writes that Ostrovsky’s statements were relayed to Findley’s friend and former colleague Paul “Pete” McCloskey, a prominent former Republican Congressman from California who had recently been named by Bush to the National and Community Service Commission.


McCloskey, a decorated Marine veteran and graduate of Stanford law school who had at one time been considered a presidential contender, flew to Ottawa to debrief Ostrovsky in person and evaluate his information.


Findley reports that Ostrovsky told McCloskey that the Mossad wanted "to do everything possible to preserve a state of war between Israel and its neighbors, assassinating President Bush, if necessary." Ostrovsky said that a PR campaign was already underway in both Israel and the United States to "prepare public acceptance of Dan Quayle as president."


Convinced that Ostrovsky was legitimate and his information significant, McCloskey jumped on the next flight to Washington, where he reported Ostrovsky’s intelligence to the Secret Service and State Department.


The apparent plot never went forward, perhaps because Ostrovsky and McCloskey had given it away.


Ostrovsky gave more details about the plot two years later in his 1994 book, “The Other Side of Deception: A Rogue Agent Exposes the Mossad's Secret Agenda,” published by HarperCollins.


In the book Ostrovsky writes that an extremist group within Mossad was responsible for the plan. He says they kept the plan secret from then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, though they believed that Shamir would have ordered such a hit himself if he hadn’t been constrained by politics. In the lead-up to Israel’s 1948 founding war, Shamir had headed up a terrorist group known for its assassinations.


In his review of Ostrovsky’s book, Ambassador Andrew Killgore, a retired career foreign service officer and publisher of the Washington Report, called the book an “insider's probing exposé of some Middle East realities that have been hidden too long from all but Israeli eyes.”


Ostrovsky writes that the Israelis planned a “false flag” operation in which they would pin the assassination on Palestinians. They kidnapped three Palestinian militants from Beirut who were to be the scapegoats, took them to Israel's Negev desert, and held them incommunicado.


“Meanwhile,” Killgore writes, “Mossad-generated threats on the president's life, seemingly from Palestinians, were leaked. These were designed to throw suspicion on the organization of rogue Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal. Names and descriptions of the three terrorists were leaked to Spanish police so that, if the plot was successful, blame would automatically fall on them.”

Ostrovsky reports that after the assassination plot was eventually cancelled, the three Palestinian prisoners were “terminated.”


Targeting Americans


If the plot had gone forward, this would not have been the first time that Israel targeted Americans for death. Nor would it be the first false flag operation. 

• In 1954 the Mossad planned to firebomb American installations, libraries, and other gathering places in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood was to be blamed for the attacks, thus causing American animosity toward Egypt. An accidental early detonation of one of the devices caused the plot, known as the Lavon Affair, to unravel before it could kill or mutilate the intended Americans.
   
• In 1967 Israeli air and sea forces perpetrated an almost two-hour assault in which they tried to sink a US Navy ship with a crew of 294. While the attack failed to sink the ship, it succeeded in killing 34 Americans and injuring 174. Some analysts have conjectured that this was also a false-flag operation; it is highly likely that Egypt would have been blamed for the attack if the ship had gone down.
   
• In 1973 Israeli fighter pilots were ordered to shoot down an unarmed U.S. reconnaissance plane (at the time the U.S. was delivering massive weaponry to Israel to prevent it from losing the “Yom Kippur” war with Egypt and Syria). While the Israelis were unable to reach the altitude of the U.S. plane, they did manage that same year to shoot down a civilian Libyan airliner that had strayed over Israeli territory, killing 104 men, women, and children. One was an American.
   
• In 1990 a Canadian-American scientist and father of seven, Gerald Bull, was assassinated in Belgium. All indications are that it was an Israeli Mossad hit team that drilled five bullets into the back of his head and neck. (Israel has assassinated a number of scientists of various nationalities. The most recent is a 32-year-old Iranian father with a young son.)
   
• In 2003 it came out that Israeli leaders had officially decided to undertake assassination operations on U.S. soil. An FBI spokesman, queried about the Israeli plans, said only: "This is a policy matter. We only enforce federal laws."
   
• In recent years a growing number of American peace activists have been intentionally killed, maimed, and injured by Israeli forces, including 23-year-old Rachel Corrie, 21-year-old Brian Avery, 37-year-old Tristan Anderson, 21-year-old Emily Henoschowitz, and 21-year-old Furkan Dogan.

All of this has been minimally reported in the U.S. press. While major news media from England to Israel to Australia covered the Jewish Times’ apparent endorsement of a possible Israeli assassination of a U.S. President, the scandal has been largely missing from U.S. media. Even Atlanta’s AP bureau inexplicably initially decided not to write a report on it, only finally sending out a story many days later.


Such news omissions concerning Israeli partisans are not rare. In 2004 a fanatic Israel loyalist wrote a letter saying that he was going to burn down Presbyterian churches while worshippers were inside (he was furious at the Presbyterian Church’s decision to divest from companies profiting from the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian land). This grisly threat also received minimal media play.


Despite Israeli violence against Americans (even while American taxpayers have given Israel far more of our tax money than to any other nation) American presidential candidates, with the exception of Ron Paul, continue to vie over who is most devoted to Israel.


It is ironic that Adler considers Obama so bad for Israel, given that Israeli analysts have rated him second only to Mitt Romney in his fidelity to Israel. And Obama has now released a seven-minute video that may catapult our first African-American president into first place in pandering to an apartheid nation.


But perhaps he’ll be safe from assassins.

Gene Simmons of KISS: "Thats what gentiles are for (to do the dirty work)"

Watch this video, to learn of the hypocrisy so rampant in the Jewish community vis-a-vie the gentile community. Old Gene Simmons of the '70s rock band KISS must need some attention, so he reaches for the sure fire way to get some cameras pointed in his direction in any meaningful way- he drags out his very own sob-story about the Holohoax. Poor Gene, old washed up loser that he is, so sad that he has to reach for that. This is his way of "jumping the shark" at the end of his career. So sad.

As you'll see in the video linked below, he goes on to also give a boilerplate testimonial about tolerance and compassion toward all peoples of the world, to give it a contemporary relevance and a kind of summation to the whole story. Thats the facade he puts up for his gentile audience. But watch this video until the very end, when old man Simmons' real feelings towards gentiles is made known to his son, as his way of passing on his bigorty to the next generation of Jews.

In addition, he speaks about his mother in the video, describing how she had been sent by the Germans to a concentraion camp during the war, and that she had witnessed her family "murdered in front of her eyes." This is of course boilerplate guilt mongering, and its typical fare on TV nowadays. However, interestingly, see below an excerpt from Gene Simons' own autobiography "Kiss and Make Up" on page 19, (Copyright 2001. The Gene Simmons Company). In this book he tells another story about his mother, and that is of his mother attacking a Palestinian woman and beating her perhaps to death in Israel. His mother did this because Gene had stolen some figs from the Palestinian woman's tree and the Palestinian woman had consequently hit Gene with a banana stalk. Gene's mother then sought revenge. Gene explains:

By the time my mother got through with this woman, I was just amazed, because I'd never seen blood literally spray out of a person's head like a sprinkler system. It was just spouting out. It looked almost comical. There was blood everywhere.

Furthermore, in this video, Gene makes the idiotic statement about the Holocaust that "they don't teach it in schools." WTF? Is he nuts?  Has all that grease paint he slathered on his face over the years gone to his brain? What school in this country does not teach this, to the point of excess? Indeed to the point of "crowding out" other topics worthy of study?

How many schools teach about the tens of millions of white Christians murdered by the Soviets? Huh, Gene?  How many schools teach about that? I'd be surprised if one high school in this nation has ever even mentioned this mass murder.

How many schools teach about the Soviet government's orchestrated famine in the Ukraine, which killed millions of Ukrainians? How many schools teach about that, huh Gene?

How many schools teach about the Armenian genocide, Gene, and the 1 to 2 million Armenian Christians murdered by the Turks?  Huh, Gene? How many schools even ever mention that? Huh, oh long tongued freak?

Can you hear me Gene? Or are you deaf from all that shit caveman rock music you've been cranking out all these years, to sell to impressionable young gentile males? The same gentile males you so degrade in front of your own son?

No, Gene, you're wrong. The Holocaust is taught ad nauseum in every school in this nation, and indeed in every school in the West. And not just in the high schools, its taught as early as the elementary school level. The Jews know they have to inculcate the myth into the gentiles from an early age, and they do so fervently. The gentile children can't escape this ridiculous Holohoax horror story no matter where they turn. They watch "educational" programs on it in school, they receive instruction on it in class, they watch entertainment movies from Holywood about this topic again and again and again. They read the Holocaust books in their english classes, such as Night or The Anne Franke Story, and others.

No wonder so few gentile children are able to examine the evidence clearly and with a critical eye, even when presented with evidence that demonstrates how the establishment's Holocaust story is nonsense. So many of them have internatlized an acceptance of the establishment's Holocaust story. To most gentiles in this country, acceptance of the Holocaust is an article of faith, and so cannot be disproven.

Heres the video of Simmons giving his violin strumming teary eyed pseudo-Holohoax story. If you're able to stand it, then again watch it until the end, for the kicker:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkgDAZanDVQ

Lastly, just for kicks, here's a radio interview Gene gave to NPR's own Terry Gross on her ironically named show "Fresh Air."  The interview goes poorly for Gene, who reveals himself to be a real insecure asshole. Its quite amusing.

However one exchange of note is when he gets angry at Terry, and comments that she has mispronounced his Hebrew name "because she has a "gentile mouth." The idiot Simmon's is apparently not aware that Terry Gross is herself a Jewess, which comes as no surprise that a media person of any prominance in this country is - shock and surprise!- a Jew. Gross quickly corrects Gene and identifies herself as a Jew. What an idiot he is. No wonder his music sucks so bad, turns out that hes not only a hypocrit, but hes a real dunce as well. LOL...

Heres the Simmon's interview on NPR's show "Fresh Air":

http://www.erim.net/archives/gene-simmons-and-terry-gross-interview

As always, if you're so inclined, then examine the information provided and make up your own mind about what a total asshole Gene Simmons is. LOL..

************************UPDATE**************************

Unfortunately, the media bosses at Jew-tube have removed the video linked and discussed above, but heres a shortened version of the video, one that contains Gene's obnoxious comment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEbhdNJqw4g

*********************************************************

The Ugly Israeli

by Guy O'toole

Non-Jewish scholar Virginia Dominguez, who spent long periods of time in Israel in later years doing research, noted the traditional Jewish narcissism and interest in pedigrees of identity expressed by the Israelis she met: "'What do you mean you say you are not Jewish?' I was asked on several occasions. 'That you're not religious? That your mother wasn't Jewish? That "we the Jews" wouldn't count you as a Jew because you had some Jewish ancestry but not the right ones, according to Halacha?' I was incredulous at first. I had no way then to anticipate this reaction. Everything else seemed to point to the importance of Jewishness, and to controlling both the content and limits of Jewishness


The omnipresent stresses of a predominantly military state, the emphatic "we versus them" paradigm of traditional Jewish identity, the glorification of power and aggression, millennia-old disdain for non-Jews, and the emotional powder keg of Holocaust death camps as a motivational tool has invariably led to the noxious Israeli persona that is so much remarked upon by non-Israelis who spend much time in Israel. This "national character" is commonly cited for its arrogance, insolence (chutzpah), coldness, roughness, and rudeness, to begin a long list of unpleasant "uncivil" attributes. Many American Jews, in noting this Israeli character, tend to romanticize it. "There is a coldness," notes Jewish scholar Norman Cantor, "a mystery, a distance from humanity about [Israelis] that anyone from another country who lives and works in Israel for a half a year will be impressed by."


"Israelis have a reputation for bad manners," notes Jewish American immigrant to Israel Charles Liebman, "to the extent this reputation is deserved it stems from the sense of familiarity that Israelis feel towards one another."

In noting their "curt nature," Adam Garfinkle adds that "Israelis are sometimes rude to an extent that it even bothers other Israelis. In 1995, Bezek, the communication company, instituted a program to get people to be more pleasant on the phone."

"The behavior of young Israelis," notes Israeli Jay Gonen, " .... is characterized by a high degree of chutzpah or gall; it is direct, blatant, unruly, clever, humorous, and indicates a certain lack of sensitivity to social requirements ... [It has a] disregard for rules, regulations, social norms, and good manners." Melford Spiro, in his study of the kibbutzim, discusses "insolence" as an "outstanding characteristic of the sabras" (native-born Israelis).

Herbert Russcol - a Jewish American emigrant to Israel - and his sabra wife Margarit Banai noted the Israeli national character this way: "'Horror stories' about the chutzpah - of the sabra-men, women, and children alike - are notorious. What appears to be (and often is) their cheek, their insolence, has shocked and enraged everyone who has met them. Sabras freely admit their chutzpah as a people, but are rarely aware of being chutzpadik themselves. They will tell you, 'Oh, we're terrible. It's a national vice. I am not so bad, but I have some very rude friends' ... Chutzpah is alarmingly close to chauvinism, and it must be admitted that the sabra is usually passionately chaunvinistic in an era when no gospel has been more discredited in the West than blind, excessive patriotism ... Our young [in the West] wish to be as universal as blades of grass. But the young Israelis cannot afford this, and will tell you defensively, 'After all, you can't build a nation without nationalism."

"The deliberate and unadorned frankness [of Israelis]," notes Zionist historian Melvin Urofsky, "so highly prized by Israelis, scornful of Westernized and 'assimilated' manners, struck [Jewish] Americans [who sought to live in Israel], accustomed to some courtesies in life, as downright rude. (As late as 1965, a study of bureaucratic behavior in one large Israeli enterprise disclosed that 60 per cent of officials in contact with the public did not believe in greeting a visitor, nor would they reply to his greeting; an even higher percentage would not offer him a chair, simply letting him stand during the interview)."

Such attributes, it may be recalled, are among those that have been noted for across the centuries of their diaspora. Leon Poliakov rhetorically noted the inevitable echo here in the European Jewish past: "Are the Jews congenitally unsociable and rude, or are they this way as a result of having been segregated in ghettos? Such was the form of the question in which arguments raged [among non-Jewish intellectuals] in the 18th century on the eve of Emancipation."

As Joyce Starr notes: "Among Americans who have had extensive dealings with Israelis, whether in government, business, or Jewish circles, the first adjectives that comes to their lips are arrogant, willful, and sometimes infuriating." Ms. Starr, who is also Jewish, notes the interchange she had with a man called J.R., "a high-ranking Israeli intelligence officer": "'Most Americans I interviewed in the government sphere - the State Department, Defense Department - use certain words when they describe Israelis.' 'Arrogant,' J. R. replied. 'Yes, arrogant is a word that comes up frequently.' 'By the way, I think it's true. It applies to most Israelis. American fairness and Israeli fairness are different.' 'What is Israeli fairness.' 'Israeli fairness is 'You give me 75 percent and leave 25 percent.' 'Do they know they do it?' 'Most of them do not. I think most of them believe that by some divine decree, they deserve to get everything.' 'What is divine decree?' 'It comes from God.' He saw me laughing. 'It's not funny, Joyce."

"To the brief tourist," wrote Leonard Wolf, a Jewish resident of Israel in 1970, "[Israelis] are a rude, unsympathetic people, intent on themselves, irresponsive to nuances of feeling. Americans, who are instantly, if not profoundly, genial, are apt to find the slow pace of Israeli friendliness cold, comparing the Jewish hotelkeepers and tourist guides they meet unfavorably with the extraordinarily warm Arabs."

In 2001, a Jewish ethnic newspaper, the Forward, noted that the national Israeli propensity to be cheats and hustlers (always evasive of the law) probably had roots in Jewish history in other lands: "[There is] universal awareness that something is definitely rotten in the state of Isael. This is, after all, a country in which bending the rules is said to be a national pasttime, cutting corners a way of life and cheating the authorities the proof of merit ... Sticklers for the law are ridiculed and abused, where anyone who works by the book is branded a sap, a 'freier,' the worst insult in modern Israeli lexicon ... Many people believe Israeli laxity, which borders on anarchy, is a national personality trait that cannot be eradicated by laws alone. Some trace the trait all the way back to the historical Jewish Diaspora, where Jews often found solace in bending the rules imposed by the often anti-Semitic authorities."

In 1986, B. Z. Sobel, an Israeli sociologist at the University of Haifa, discussed his research into reasons why so many Israelis emigrate from Israel to other lands. Among the motivations for leaving, he noted that "there is indeed an edginess [in Israeli society]; tempers flare, and verbal violence is rampant ... A large proportion of those [Israelis] interviewed for my study ... have been abroad [overseas] or were born or raised abroad, and in almost all cases reference is made to the fact that 'people are nice in chutz la'aretz.' Strangers wish you a good day as they make change or pass you in the street, whereas at home [Israel] you can consider yourself fortunate to receive minimally civil treatment."

Among Sobel's interviews with fellow Jews in Israel was one with an immigrant who had resided there for twelve years. At some point in his interview with her, she "broke down and wept ... repeating over and over the word 'garbage': 'People here are garbage, garbage. They're hateful. I hate this place.'" Another interviewee, this one born Israeli, when asked by Sobel why she was emigrating to the United States, "laughed almost hysterically, and shouted, 'Why? Why? Because over there [in the United States] I am a child of God, a child of God. I am treated like a human being wherever I go. I am not shouted at our abused. Washer women in the supermarket don't command me to watch my step. Why?'"

"Americans are much more polite, I would say," remarked Israeli journalist Ze'ev Schiff, "while we are rude and have no patience ... You can see it when some of us are waiting in a queue in a bank or waiting for a bus ... This is the way we deal with each other, with the Egyptians, the Europeans, whoever." As Joyce Starr adds, "The tension [in Israel] spills out in sudden eruptions of rudeness. You can be standing in line in a gas station, and suddenly there will be an outbreak of shouts and terrible cursing for no apparent reason except that people explode in Israel."

Moshe Shokeid notes the comments of an Israeli identified as "Eli," and his perceptions of the Israelis he met in New York City: "When I looked at the crowd, I subconsciously saw myself in the mirror. When you see other Israelis screaming in Hebrew, you realize that you possibly look the same. Unfortunately, I rediscovered the ugly Israeli."

In the 1980s, Virginia Dominguez, a non-Jewish American sociologist of Cuban heritage, fluent in Hebrew and a Fulbright scholar in Israel, worried that obnoxious Israeli behavior and Jewish self-obsession threatened to push her into the camp of the anti-Semites: "Has my obsessive, long-term encounter with Israeli society over the past six years turned me into the anti-Semite I never was? I find myself sharply intolerant of the noisy, brash behavior of most Israeli children. I coin terms of description that are even explicitly judgmental. I get exasperated with the perennial references in the [Hebrew] media to the Jewishness of well-known public figures abroad."

Wendy Orange, a Jewish American, a new immigrant to Israel, noted with irritation the commentary of a group of Christian visitors she overheard in Jerusalem restaurant: "I overheard one Ghanaian woman say, 'Just ghastly, these people!' She's talking to a pregnant Irish woman, who responded wholeheartedly: 'I never imagined they'd be so crude ... so rude.' The Ghanaian, tall and dignified, her hair wrapped high in a colorful African sash, became more emphatic: 'No manners ... They drive like madmen.' She paused. 'They are far more barbarian than I was warned. And I was warned, my dear, many times."

An American Jewish scholar, Adam Garfinkle, noted his own child's experience in Israel's playgrounds: "One day I saw two boys square off in the playground, and one gave the other a good pop to the chin. The victim ran to the teacher and complained that Yossi had hit him. The teacher said, quite typically, "Well, go hit him back." By the time the child gets to first grade, he knows not to embarrass himself by going to the teacher for such matters. When [my son] Nate entered the first grade in the states the next year, we were not surprised to learn that he was 'a bit rough' with his friends."

In such an Israeli socialization of children, Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, a professor in Israel, sees the classical Zionist dynamic: "A significant part of the Israeli self-image is an ideal of toughness, which is contrasted to the softness of Diaspora Jews. The creation of a separate new Israeli identity was accomplished by many expressions of contempt for any form of weakness or moral sensitivity."

This harsh worldview, deeply aggrieved, shamed and angered by the Holocaust, and "centuries of persecution," celebrates ruthless pragmatism as its interrelational essence. Exploiting the Jewish suffering in the Holocaust as a moral shield from criticism, David Ben-Gurion once proclaimed, "It is not important what Gentiles say, what matters is what Jews do." Or as another Israeli prime minister (born in America), Golda Meir, put it: "The nations of Europe who did not help us during the Holocaust are not entitled to preach to us."

In 1973, Georges Tamarin, an Israeli psychologist, was alarmed at what he called the Israeli "cult of toughness," the "Israeli authoritarian personality," and its attendant "traits of ethnocentrism, glorification of strength and the prevailing admiration of the army." "Aggressiveness, loudness, ignorance of basic international expressions, and fascination with arms are held to be grounds for pride." Tamarin saw in such national values an emphatic counter-construct and overcompensation against the embarrassing image of the physically weak European "ghetto Jew." He noted the "the constant preoccupation of Israeli youth with physical strength and courage and some caricaturist demonstrations of toughness and  (he) manhood (lack of inhibitions, loud speech, the ideal of the [military] parachutist, about whom all the women are 'crazy,' overemphasis on masculine symbols (in a style which is a curious mixture of Biblical and Hollywood-type narratives; see the 'Exodus') are dominant traits of the Israeli authoritarian personality."

"Our negligence," complained Israeli Meron Benvenisti in 1989, "of ... values such as the brotherhood of man, social justice, and civil equality to all ha[s] led inexorably to chauvinism and xenophobia ... It is tempting to take the easy way out and dismiss the right-wing chauvinists and religious fundamentalists [in Israel] as an aberration, as marginal, half-crazed fanatics. Yet very influential sections of Israeli public opinion accept their philosophy, albeit considering them 'good boys who slipped'."

In 1989 an American-born Jew, Aaron Wolf, wrote a book about his experiences in the Israeli army. On one occasion after the killing of some Arab combatants, says the author, "I cornered Alon, the Chicagoan whose specialty is falling in love and who was one of the men on that patrol. 'Hey, Alon,' I said, 'Tell me something. You've been trained as a medic. You've had a three-month course learning how to save lives. How do you feel now that you've killed somebody?' 'How do I feel?' he said. 'I feel hungry."

In 1989, Israeli commentators noted with concern a rash of brash "Russian Roulette"-styled behaviors in the country's youth. Groups of children were playing games of life and death daring with passing cars and trains, leaping out, or lying down, in front of them. Reuters called it a "deadly plague" happening to the Jewish state. "Adults gamble," a Jerusalem high school teacher told the wire service, "but the children have less money so they gamble with their lives. I believe Israeli behavior on the roads is macho, and I this is the way children without licenses behave in the streets." Reuters also noted that "when Education Minister Yitzak Navon asked during a school visit why pupils played the deadly game, students replied: 'To show they're brave,' 'To tempt death,' and 'Just to show off.'

Perhaps these children sought to emulate their parents; driving cars dangerously is an Israeli tradition. Too many people in Israel drive their automobiles like maniacs, daring death on the highways. "Twice as many Israelis," notes Lesley Hazeleton, "were killed on the roads during the Lebanon war as in the war itself. If a man was driving particularly recklessly, people would say that he'd just come back from reserve service in Lebanon. They were only half joking."

From the founding of the Jewish state in 1948 to 1990, over 30,000 Israelis died in car accidents, more than twice the number of all the Jews killed in Israeli wars in the same period. In the years 1985 and 1986, a total of ten Israelis were killed by terrorists. Meanwhile, 893 people died in car crashes on Israeli highways. Although Israel is a country of only about six million people, between 1948 and 1990 nearly 630,000 people had been injured in car accidents.

As Joyce Starr noted in 1990, "If the present pace of accidents continues, two people in every Israeli family will be injured, and one person in every ten families will be killed. The number of children killed in auto accidents since 1967 is equivalent to almost a hundred grade school classes."

By 1999, the New York Times wire services noted the concern in Israel that its collective aggressive psyche was beginning to run amuck: "Israel has always had a rough edge, it has always been a society where aggression and rudeness was accepted as by-products of life under siege ... [But] after several exceptionally brutal crimes - two men killed their wives and children and set their bodies on fire - and new studies detailing the level of brutality in the schools, there has emerged an intense focus on violence among Israelis that has temporarily pushed aside the historic focus on conflict with the Arabs." "We have to deal with it exactly as we have with terrorism," said Ze'ev Friedman, "director of health, welfare, and social services for the city of Tel Aviv, "... because this is nothing less than an integral form of terrorism".

The same year a Tel Aviv Municipality study found that 12.5 percent of the homes in the Tel Aviv-Jaffa area (the largest population density in Israel) were tainted by domestic violence.

In 2000, Israel's National Council for the Welfare of the Child noted in its annual report the alarming rise in violence emanating from Israel's youth. "Complaints of violence by children in educational institutions" rose by 227% from 1995 to 1999. There were 29,000 criminal investigations of minors in 1999 alone. Also between 1994 and 1999, the number of children under 12 seeking help from call-in hotlines because of sexual abuse rose from 143 to 603. "I have no other words to describe it than to say our society is undergoing a process of bestialization," declared Dr. Asher Ben-Arye, the deputy-general of the National Council, and the editor of the disturbing report. By 2001, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that "Israel, one of the world's smallest countries, ranks eighth in the world in youth violence." That same year, Miss Israel, Ilanit Levy, wore a diamond-studded bullet-proof vest as a fashion statement at the Miss Universe competition.

In 2001, Great Britain's online Telegraph newspaper noted 'Israelis - who take pride in being blunt and outspoken - are to teach children good manners in an attempt to cut the nation's tendency towards violence. From the next school year, 12-year-olds will be taught how to behave politely, which knife and fork to use at table, and how to resolve arguments without shouting or coming to blows. Ronit Tirosh, director-general of the Education Ministry said: 'We are a brutal and impatient society, and the delicacy learned through these lessons may reduce our society's violent tendencies.' Israelis are proud not to say thank you and relish the informality of life ... Israeli life is a bruising contest of one-upmanship. The deepest fear is to be thought a 'sucker' who obeys the rules. Brusqueness has been cultivated by native-born Israelis as a reaction against the manners of Europe's Diaspora Jews, who were seen as cringing and subservient ... Educationalists have become worried about the level of playground violence."

In 1999 the mood in Israel was such that an Israeli court was expected to give a convicted Israeli murderer of a British tourist a reduced sentence because of flashbacks he had of his military work executing Arabs. Major Daniel Okev claimed he murdered Gentile hitch-hiker Max Hunter and wounded his girlfriend "during a flashback to his days in a secret Israeli hit squad which targeted suspected Palestinian terrorists for summary execution ... When he found himself at night in his car with two strangers, Okev said he believed he had a flashback to similar occasions on operations in Gaza. He looked down and saw his gun, sparking the murder."

Traditional Jewish "chutzpah" is of course an integral part of the Israeli identity. "To a large degree," says Israeli professor Jay Gonen, "... Herzl's impact [on Jewish nationalism] was due to a quality of chutzpah, or unmitigated gall, which became an integral part of Zionism and was subsequently elevated almost to an art form by native-born Israelis, or sabras."

An example of how far this chutzpah can go was evidenced in an incident during the Palestinian uprising - known as the Intifada - that began in 1987 against Israeli occupation in Gaza and the West Bank. Of the hundreds of Palestinians shot and killed or wounded by Israeli troops in the Intifada's first year, one young Arab teenager, Nasir Hawwash, was shot in the head and lay in a hospital, irrecoverably brain dead. One day Nasir's brother received a telephone call from a Jewish Israeli citizen, an emissary for the family of a fellow middle-aged Israeli in the hospital with a serious heart condition. The stranger on the phone asked that the Hawwash family donate Nasir's heart to save the Jewish man in the hospital who needed it. "Nasir's older brother," notes Glenn Frankel, "was appalled that an Israeli would ask such a thing. She told him, 'This is how we'll make peace between Arabs and Jews.' He was not buying it. 'How can you make peace when you shoot someone and then you take the heart to give life to another Israeli?' he told her." As the story for the heart request made the Israeli news, one Palestinian "radical" noted that "If we give the Israelis this heart, soon they'll be shooting us for our organs."

The Arab boy's father was eventually offered "more money than [his] family would have seen in a lifetime" for his son's heart, but he told the Israeli pleaders no. "What did they want from me?" he asked. "This was my son. They took him away, then they wanted his body. This I could not give."


http://thejewishtribe.blogspot.com/p/ugly-israeli.html

Special thanks to the blog 'Non-Jew with a View' for the above essay. Checkout his other blog posts at the link above. He has an excellent and informative blog.



In addition, here is a funny sign posted in the lobby at a hotel located in the Phi Phi Islands. Effin hilarious. Thanks again to "Non-Jew with a View" for this. LOL, effin classic. Book me on a trip to the Phi Phi Islands.. stat!
http://thejewishtribe.blogspot.com/2011/12/people-of-phi-phi-island-in-thailand.html

But enough about how ugly Jews are on the inside, lets see how they look on the outside... LOL.. Such a handsome race of nation-wreckers, pedophiles and murderers.. LOL..

http://vimeo.com/33275527

And as always, if you're so inclined, then examine the information provided and make up your own mind about it.

Jewish Ritual Murder: An Examination of this Millennia Old Accusation

The claim of Ritual Murder has been leveled against the Jews for millenia across Europe and the Mid East, among the dozens of gentile nations the Jewish have inhabited. This accusation bears some odd commonalities over the millenia which strengthen the argument for its validity. For example, gentile nation after gentile nation make the accusation of murder against extremist Jewish cults specifically involving the exsanguination of the gentile child victim. Also, in the cases of male victims, the child is also often found to have been circumcised. Now, this accusation is shared between gentile peoples which have long since hated each other, and bear little love for the other's culture. Yet, despite this, the accusation of Jewish Ritual Murder bear these unusual commonalities. Why is that? Why would gentile peoples, again many of whom hate each other, and most of whom speak different languages, decide to "get together" and spread a rumor with these specific and bizarre claims?  One possible answer is that the different gentile peoples of Europe and the Mid East did not conspire together to spread this wild tale, but rather that the wild tale is in fact true. That is to say, that Jews have been found to have conducted debased and despicable acts of ritual murder against innocent gentile children down through the millenia, and that the childrens' blood was exsanguinated, and in the cases of male gentile children, the victim had also been circumcised.

The Jews- always a people with a flair for the dramatic- have coined a phrase for this accusation, and that is "Blood Libel." Indeed, the Jews now even have a secret "slush fund" worth millions of dollars for combating accusations of Jewish Ritual Murder around the world wherever they may arise, regardless of the specifics of the case at hand, and indeed regardless of the guilt or innocence of the Jews so accused.

So what of this accusation of Jewish Ritual Murder? What specific proofs exist regarding this grisly accusation?  The Jews advise that these allegations are always groundless, and are the result of "anti-semitism." Well, below are two excellent and lengthy videos on this very topic, and represent an excellent "beginner's course" on this horrific and millenia old phenomenon. Watch the videos, examine the evidence, explore the topic on your own, and decide for yourselves:

Human Sacrifice Among Fanatical Hasidic Cults
http://wideeyecinema.com/?p=9952

Jewish Ritual Murder Revisited:The Hidden Cult
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/65847/Jewish_Ritual_Murder_Revisited_The_Hidden_Cult/

In addition, here is an Oprah Winfrey show from 1989 where a Jewess talks about how her family practiced the Jewish Ritual Murder of babies, going back (in her family) to the 1700s.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b98ch_Pyi-Y

If you're so inclined, then as previously mentioned, examine the information provided and make up your own mind about it.

A Skeleton is Found in a Synogogue's Cellar Buried Beneath a Pile of Coal. The News Story is Buried As Well...

Now, how many churches have skeletons lying around in the basement? Well, this synogogue did. The skeleton had been there for an estimated 30 years... Some unfortunate goyim met their end there, no doubt.

The article in the New York Times is very brief, as was no doubt the NYPD inquiry into the matter....

http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/14/nyregion/a-long-lost-skeleton-in-a-synagogue-cellar.html?scp=1&sq=A%20Long-Lost%20Skeleton%20In%20a%20Synagogue%20Cellar%20&st=cse

A Long-Lost Skeleton In a Synagogue Cellar
Published: April 14, 1989
 
A dark - or, in any case, bizarre -chapter in the otherwise venerable history of the Eldridge Street Synagogue on the Lower East Side was reopened yesterday when a long-lost skull rolled out from a coal-ash pile and struck the foot of a workman. Soon, an entire skeleton was in view. After inspection by a medical examiner, the bones were taken to the Fifth Precinct station house. The official word from the police was that they could not identify the body or determine its sex. It had apparently been in the cellar more than 30 years.

The unoffical word, according to Betty Sandler, administrative director of the Eldridge Street Project, was that ''it might be a young girl, in her late teens or early 20's, which would make for an unsavory story.''

Workers are excavating the cellar of the 102-year-old synagogue, between Canal and Division Streets, in the first phase of its restoration.

Not the faintest rumor or oldest lore explains the skeleton. Judge Paul P. E. Bookson of Civil Court, who has worshiped at the synagogue for three decades, said he had ''absolutely no information, no inkling'' as to who it might be or how it came to be there. 

He said the congregation made a rabbinical inquiry and was told, ''Halakha, the Jewish law, will require that when all the forensics and pathology are completed, the synagogue will be obliged to inter the remains.''

Again.


Now, there are 8 points to consider about this NYT newspaper article:

Firstly: why do the police say:

"The official word from the police was that they could not identify the body or determine its sex. It had apparently been in the cellar more than 30 years."

What are they talking about, they cannot determine its sex? They have the fucking skeleton. Of course they can determine its sex. Its only been buried beneath that pile of coal in the synagogues cellar for 30 years. Forensic analysts are able determnine the sex of people's skeletons who have been deceased for a lot longer than 30 years. So why do the police conclude that they're not able to determine the gender of this victim? Did anyone in the NYPD even TRY to determine who this person is? Was the case dropped immediately, as is likely the case? 

Secondly: why does this "Betty Sandler" Jewess say: "'it might be a young girl, in her late teens or early 20's, which would make for an unsavory story."  Well, who gives a fuck what kind of story it would make, you effin bitch: why do you think its a girl, when the cops say THEY CANNOT IDENTIFY THE GENDER OF THE SKELETON??  Is Betty Sandler some kind of forensics expert? Or does she have some hidden knowledge about this case?

Thirdly: there may be another reason the Jewess Betty Sandler decided to contradict the police report that they "could not determine its sex," and that is because the skeleton was that of a child. This would explain why the police could not identify the gender of the skeleton, as the skeletons of male and female children are hard to differentiate, as prior to puberty the female pelvic structure is not dissimilar to that of a male child. The Jewess Betty Sandler may have thrown out this nonsense about "''it might be a young girl, in her late teens or early 20's, which would make for an unsavory story,'' to cover for the fact that the skeleton is a child. Yes, no doubt it would make for an unsavory story, Miss Sandler, but it makes for a far less unsavory story than that of a murdered child being found in a synogogue's cellar. This is especially true considering the millenia old accusation of Jewish Ritual Murder, where the gentile child is tortured and exsanguinated, and their blood used for debased Jewish occult ritual practices. This Sandler woman may be trying to "nip this in the bud," by putting out the misinformation that this was an adult woman who's skeleton was found there, and not that of a gentile child murdered by Jews in some unspeakable ritual murder. A murdered woman is unsavory enough, but its not nearly as unsavory as a child's murder, given what we know of the millenia old accusation of Jewish Ritual Murder.

Fourth: the Judge quoted in the story is not only a jew, but he attended this particular synagogue where the skeleton was found!

"Judge Paul P. E. Bookson of Civil Court, who has worshiped at the synagogue for three decades, said he had ''absolutely no information, no inkling'' as to who it might be or how it came to be there."

Is this Judge working on this case? Why does the NYT quote him?  If hes working on this case, and he attended this very synogogue for "3 decades" shouldn't he recuse himself due to an obvious conflict of interest?  Also, since the body has been in the cellar rotting for 3 decades, isn't it possible that this judge they quote in this article, was actually a member of this synogogue at the very same time that this victim met his or her grisly end? Indeed, isn't it possible that this Judge was in some way involved in the foul murder itself?  So, why is this Judge being quoted?  He's not likely to be very objective, seeing as how hes both a jew and had attended that very synogogue at the same time as this victims death and buriel beneath a pile of cole in the basement. Of course this Judge is going to say he has no idea how the skeleton got there...LOL..  Unbelievable.

Fifth: checkout the strange wording in this story where they state:

"Not the faintest rumor or oldest lore explains the skeleton."

NOT THE FAINTEST RUMOR OR OLDEST LORE EXPLAINS THE SKELETON??? Isn't that a strange thing to say? There certainly IS an old lore that explains the skeleton: there have been allegations against Jews for commmiting the Ritual Murder of gentile children for millenia. This accusation holds that the Jewish perpetrators of this crime drain the blood of the victim for their ancient and depraved rites. This accusation has been leveled against Jews for thousands of years IN EVERY GENTILE NATION IN WHICH THEY'VE EVER RESIDED. Why would gentiles- who speak different languages and who often hate each other- suddently get together to "make up" these stories of Jews specifically abducting gentile children and exsanguinating them down through the millenia as part of their Jewish occult ritual practices?  One possible answer, that we must consider, is that all these different gentile peoples all claim Jews did this unspeakable act of ritual murder, in gentile nation after gentile nation, down through the millenia, because Jews DID DO THAT, again and again and again. That is a possibility we must consider as rational, sober people. To rule it out as "blood libel" against the jewish people, or as mere anti-semetic propaganda, doesn't do the evidence justice.

Sixth: can you imagine the media outcry that would have ensued if a skeleton would have been found by workmen at a Christian church?  Can you imagine the media frenzy that would have ensued? Every coked-up network anchorwoman would've been screaming bloody murder from the top of her lungs, and every homosexual and jew anchorman would've been doing the same. Yet here we have a skeleton found by workers at an 102 year old synagogue and the story only warrants a short article buried on the backpages of the NYT. The media's response couldn't have been more subdued.

Seventh: Look at what a small newstory this NYT article is, and yet look at how many questions it raises, and how few answers it provides. This is often the case when Jewish crimes are partially uncovered, the news reporting is often strange, and subdued, and lacking in any real answers. What a strangely worded news article that is. So keep a sharp eye on the news, especially when it touches upon things related to Jews and their ways. The vast majority of the gentile public is hopeless ignorant, and indeed incurably ignorant of the foul deeds being perpetrated by this extremist and shameless minority in our midst. Be a part of the knowledgable 1%, and keep a sharp eye out for those close to you who have the intelligence and the intergrity to handle the truth. There aren't many out there who have both of these traits, however when you locate one, take the chance and wake them up to whats going on.

And lastly: Be warned of Jewish Ritual Murder. Keep your children close and keep an eye on them every moment that you can, lest your child end up a skeleton buried beneath a pile of coal in the basement of a synagogue. And perhaps more cruely, lest the story about your murdered child end up burried deep in the backpages of the NYT.

As always, if you're so inclined, then examine the evidence provided and make up your own mind about it.

Gingrich to the Jews: "Get Me Elected and You'll Get Your War with Iran"

Gingrich is sucking up to the Jews, big surprise: He says he'll tap John Bolton as Secretary of State. Bolton's a neo-con, right-wing, bloodthirsty Judeo Supremacist asshole, to put it mildly. By making this claim, its very obvious what Gingrich is saying to the Jews here:

"Get me elected and you'll get your war with Iran."

So this is the choice in November:

War or maybe War.

Thats the choice between the GOP nominee and Obama.

This what Orwell meant by "War is Peace." Perpetual war is the new normal. Madness.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/7/gingrich-john-bolton-will-be-my-secretary-state/


Gingrich: John Bolton will be my secretary of state

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich promised conservatives on Tuesday he would ask former U.N. Ambassador John R. Bolton to be his secretary of state if he’s elected president next year, according to several of those who met with him.

Hours later he repeated that vow publicly to the Republican Jewish Coalition, winning a round of applause.

“If he accepts it, I will ask John Bolton to be secretary of state,” said the former House speaker, who national polls show has vaulted to the top of the Republican presidential field and leads in three of the first four states that will vote for the next Republican nominee.

During the closed-door meeting in Arlington, Mr. Gingrich spoke and fielded questions for about two hours from 70 conservatives, and many said afterward that they came away impressed.

“The fact that he asked for that meeting” shows that “he understands the value of that movement,” said Amy Kremer, head of the Tea Party Express, who attended the conservative gathering.

Many of the conservative leaders in attendance have been looking for a candidate to endorse in the run-up to the GOP primary season, which begins in less than a month. Others said that, while they likely won’t endorse anyone, they wanted to take the measure of Mr. Gingrich, who has a long and sometimes rocky history with the movement.

Asked by one questioner how he could assure conservatives he would be trustworthy, Mr. Gingrich volunteered that he would tap Mr. Bolton, a hero to conservatives who served President George W. Bush first as the State Department’s top nonproliferation official and then as an outspoken ambassador to the United Nations. Mr. Bolton’s strong views and skepticism of multilateral bodies like the United Nations, and Mr. Bush named him as a recess appointment to the U.N. ambassadorship after Senate Democrats  refused to confirm him.

Mr. Gingrich’s statement that Mr. Bolton would be his pick to head the State Department drew applause from the conservatives.

“John Bolton is certainly extremely well thought of by those in the conservative movement who care about national security, and I would certainly love to see him as secretary of state,” said Gary Bauer, president of American Values and a leading social conservative.

Mr. Bolton has not endorsed anyone in the race and his office said it was unlikely he would comment on Mr. Gingrich’s invitation to serve.

In his meeting with conservatives, Mr. Gingrich repeated his pledge to go after federal judges he believes are overstepping their roles, and also said he would require people who served in his administration to accept his platform, which he said would be conservative.

Asked if he is prepared to face tough personal attacks if he becomes the nominee, the former Georgia congressman replied that he was going to run a campaign focused on ideas, and said he had faith Americans would forgive him for past personal troubles such as his two failed marriages.

Penny Young Nance, president and CEO of Concerned Women for America, who attended the meeting, said she agreed American voters love redemption stories and are ready to be forgiving in Mr. Gingrich’s case. But she cautioned the attacks will be rough.

“I don’t underestimate, and I hope he doesn’t underestimate just the viciousness of the Obama campaign machine and how they are willing to dredge up anything, truth or lie, and he does need to be completely prepared,” she said.

Last month, a prominent evangelical leader said Mr. Gingrich must personally confront his marital failings if he wants to win over religious conservative voters. Ms. Nance said Mr. Gingrich does have more work to do in that area.


**********UPDATE**********

Columnist Patrick Buchanan agrees with me. Checkout his column released AFTER I made this post. Buchanan states"

And who is John Bolton?
       
Newt Gingrich told two groups Wednesday he intends to name Bolton secretary of state.
       
With Newt appointing as America's first diplomat an uber-hawk who makes Dick Cheney look like Gandhi, and Mitt Romney's foreign policy team crawling with neocons primed for war with Iran, a vote for the GOP in 2012 looks more and more like a vote for war.
       
Like the Bourbons of old, the Republican Party seems to have learned nothing and forgotten nothing.


Heres his entire column:

Marco Rubio vs. Rand Paul

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=48044

As always, examine the evidence presented and make up your own mind about it.